[xquery-talk] xquery 3.1 wishlist

[W.S. Hager]

Sorry, I didn't mention I was thinking about the case where I would create
a library module instead of using inline functions.

2015-06-28 21:01 GMT+02:00 Michael Kay <mike at saxonica.com>:

>
> > On 28 Jun 2015, at 19:32, W.S. Hager <wshager at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > One more consideration: function calls seem to be more expensive than
> inline expressions.
>
> Saxon and I’m sure other products will inline function calls when they
> consider it appropriate. Because XQuery is side-effect-free and has no
> polymorphism, this is a pretty straightforward optimization.
>
>
> > And then there's that baggage of a custom library...
> >
>
> I’m not sure what you’re referring to here.
>
> Michael Kay
> Saxonica




-- 

W.S. Hager
Lagua Web Solutions
http://lagua.nl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://x-query.com/pipermail/talk/attachments/20150628/a3ff5701/attachment.html>